 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Your Location: Home > News & Events > Articles > A Time To Tap, A Time To MillA Time To Tap, A Time To MillThread milling and tapping are two methods for machining threads in a hole. Tapping is more popular, but thread milling has several advantages that might be important in your application. By PETER ZELINSKI
Tapping is not the only choice for machining threads in a hole-most shops know that. Most shops also know at least some of the advantages of thread milling, though the list is long. For example, a thread milling tool can address a range of hole diameters instead of just one hole size. The thread mill can place threads closer to the bottom of a blind hole, and it can machine threads in big holes with ease. The thread mill leaves room for chips to fall away. And the thread mill, unlike a tap, can combine various hole-making operations into a single tool. In short, there is a great deal that a thread mill can do. However, most shops will continue to machine most of their threaded holes using taps. And there are good reasons for this. Tapping is simple. In many ways, tapping is less demanding. Tapping can be done on a range of machines, at conventional speeds, without a helically interpolated tool path.
Alan Shepherd, technical director of Emuge - the Northborough, Massachusetts, supplier of taps and thread mills - routinely works with machining facilities to find the right thread-machining processes for their needs. The more demanding applications often call for thread milling, which solves a variety of challenges related to thread machining. But don't discount the value of a tap, he says. "If you are machining mild steel-say, 20 parts with 10 threaded holes each-then go ahead and tap them," he says. "But if you have 150 of those parts, or if you are machining an exotic metal, then it may be time to consider thread milling." That is, provided the machine tool has that capability, he adds. Mr. Shepherd applied his experience toward compiling the guidelines below. Based on his recommendations, what follows are variables to consider when determining which approach to thread machining makes the most sense. Machine ToolTapping can be done on almost any machining center or milling machine. By contrast, thread milling requires-at the very least-a CNC machining center that can be programmed for helical interpolation. Tapping can also be performed on lathes with rotary-tool capability. The need for helical motion tends to rule out thread milling on these machines. MaterialTapping can be used in almost any material up to a hardness of 50 Rc. Thread milling can be used in materials up to 60 Rc. When it comes to exotic metals, thread milling sometimes offers an easy way to machine threads that otherwise would be difficult to produce. SpeedWhile tapping runs at relatively slow speeds, thread milling generally requires higher cutting speeds and feed rates. The helical tool path is long, so a high feed rate is needed in order to generate the thread within an efficient cycle time. Pitch DiameterThe pitch diameter of a tap is fixed, but the pitch diameter of a thread milling tool is more flexible. The pitch of the thread generated by the latter tool is determined by the CNC tool path, and this means the pitch diameter can change. For example, two holes of different diameter could be threaded with the same pitch. The same tool could produce 1/4-20 UNC or 1/4-20 STI threads. Thread milling can also allow a single tool to give the same pitch to a range of hole diameters. For example, 1/2-14 NPT and 3/4-14 NPT threads could be produced without a tool change in between.
MultifunctionalityA tap can only be expected to tap. A thread mill, by comparison, can be designed to perform a variety of hole-making operations. One single tool could drill the hole, chamfer the hole, machine the thread and convolute it (cutting away the incomplete portion of the thread at the bottom). HandednessA tap can only produce the "hand" of the tap-right or left-that is ground into the tool. But a simple change in CNC programming can allow the thread mill to produce either a left- or right-hand thread. (Another disadvantage of tapping is related to this design limitation. The tap has to be reversed at the end of the tapping operation, because it has to be "unscrewed" out of the hole. But a thread mill can just leave the cut and retract from the hole at a rapid rate.) Depth, Part IWhen the hole is blind, a tap can only reach so far. The tapered "point" of the tap will bottom out, leaving only incomplete threads for the rest of the depth of the hole. A thread mill, with its flat bottom, doesn't have this problem. It can machine complete threads down deeper, closer to the bottom of the same blind hole. Depth, Part IIBy contrast, when the thread is particularly deep, a tap may shine. A long tap can machine threads effectively in a hole that goes a long way down. This is not the case with a thread mill. In thread milling, because the cutting forces are not balanced, the tool is prone to deflect. Beyond a certain depth, the deflection becomes too great to machine the thread well. In general, a thread mill is limited to a depth of about 2.5 times the diameter of the tool. (But non-traditional thread mill designs do address this limitation. See Thread Milling In Deep Holes.) ChipsThe long continuous chip that is sometimes produced when certain materials are tapped can be a problem. The chip can bind in the hole and break the tool. There is no problem comparable to this in thread milling. Like any milling operation, thread milling produces short, broken chips. Chip management is a common reason why shops choose thread milling. PowerTaps are run at relatively slow spindle speeds. For this reason, the full, rated horsepower of the machine's spindle motor probably is not available to a tap. This usually is not a cause for concern-but it might be. A small machining center confronted with the need to tap a particularly large hole might lack the power to make this cut. For this small machine, thread milling expands the diameter of holes that the machine is able to thread successfully.
As seen in Modern Machine Shop, June 2005 |
Emuge's "Threads-All" is an example of a thread mill that can overcome the depth limit common to thread milling. A thread mill typically engages the material with multiple points of contact, meaning the cutting force can be significant. On a thread mill, this force is unbalanced - unlike the force on a tap, which is distributed around the circumference. Plus, a thread mill is slender, with a maximum diameter smaller than the minor diameter of thread to be machined. All of these characteristics leave the thread mill prone to deflect. The tool is usually limited to a depth of 2.5 times its diameter. To overcome this limit, the Threads-All design uses a single point of contact for machining (specifically, a replaceable insert). The lower cutting force from the use of this single edge is coupled with a higher stiffness, which comes from a rigid steel shank.
Tapping is a proven and often productive means of machining a thread in a hole. But a thread mill (above) can be more versatile, and a thread mill can also solve problems related to chips, horsepower and blind holes.